top of page

Tax &
Legal

Wealth
Management

Global
Mobility

Luxury Assets
& Tech

Real
Estate

Company
News

NEWS & INSIGHTS
The Privacy Paradox

Schillings partner Lily Kennett on the privacy paradox: how fragments of public information — property records, family ties, social media, travel patterns — can be combined into security, reputational and financial risks for wealthy families.

By

Schillings

Published

30 July 2026

How publicly available information can be combined to create security, reputational and financial risks for families.

Risk rarely stems from a single disclosure – although it can, so it is worth implementing a privacy strategy around major projects or transactions that are likely to leave documentation in the public domain. More often, risks arise from hostile actors drawing together fragments of information from across social media, public records, and proprietary databases to gain insight into an individual and their world.


Details on property ownership, family connections, social media activity and travel patterns may seem innocuous enough as isolated pieces of information but reviewed together they can provide a surprisingly detailed picture of an individual or family. In the wrong hands, that information can be used to facilitate cyber-attacks, frauds, extortion, media intrusion, or other harms.


Moreover, these risks – whether they are cyber, reputational, or security related – can rapidly converge. For example, a data breach can easily trigger media scrutiny or extortion attempts.


Ultimately, privacy and reputation are more closely linked than many people might think. Privacy is what people know about you, and reputation is what people say about you. The two are in some sense inseparable, and impacts on privacy and reputation have real world consequences: transactions disrupted, financing or professional services withdrawn, and loss of stakeholder confidence.


Why privacy should be viewed as a resilience issue rather than simply a personal preference.

Resilience comes from knowledge and control of your profile, not obscurity which is can be a real weakness in the event of a public controversy.


A resilient individual or family is not necessarily one with no public profile, but one that understands what information is available and how it appears to those who are outside looking in. Effective management of privacy is therefore not secrecy but control on your online profile.


A controlled profile builds resilience by ensuring that there is accurate and up to date information available and that this is focused appropriately to meet your business and personal needs. Ideally, this type of controlled content would be developed on an ongoing basis to maintain resilience over time and should work hand in glove with a privacy strategy that addresses both business needs and personal security.


Practical steps families, family offices and advisers can take to manage emerging risks.

You can't manage risks if you don’t know what they are and how they are specific to you and your family or business. The starting point is understanding what a motivated and well-resourced actor could find about you if they chose to do so. This can be identified through a comprehensive privacy audit of your digital, corporate and personal footprint.


We often tell clients that you need to assess your profile in the same way a bad actor would. That requires an honest, forensic assessment of what information is accessible, how it could be exploited and where the greatest vulnerabilities lie.


Only once you understand that can you develop an effective strategy to mitigate risk. Without that diagnosis, any strategy that you develop risks being based on guesswork


There are a range of practical measures, habits, and policies that informed families and advisers can implement to reduce exposure and strengthen resilience. It is wide to address this proactively as new information is constantly entering the public domain, and managing these risks is an ongoing process and not a one-off exercise.



By Lily Kennett, Schillings
By Lily Kennett, Schillings

Related

When Love Meets the Law: Assisted Dying, the Suicide Act 1961, and the Forfeiture Rule

By

PCD

Form 708 Is Here: The 40% Recipient Tax on Covered Expatriate Gifts

By

Global Taxes LLC

Navigating the US-UK Private Client Landscape: Donald Dashers, FIG Regime, and the Transatlantic Corridor

By

PCD

You may also be interested in

Philanthropy in Practice: Reflections from the Jersey Roundtable

By

PCD

Relocation to Barbados: Tax Planning, Property, and the Case for the Caribbean

By

PCD

When Love Meets the Law: Assisted Dying, the Suicide Act 1961, and the Forfeiture Rule

By

PCD

Inheritance Tax and Succession Planning for UK Property Investors: Key Takeaways from PCD Group's Webinar

By

PCD

bottom of page